The Scientific Revolution and the Origins of Modern Science.

According to Andrew Dickson White and many of his colleagues, Galileo's experiences demonstrate a classic case of a scholar forced to recant a scientific insight because it offended powerful, conservative forces in society: for the church at the time, it was not the scientific method that should be used to find truth -- especially in certain areas -- but the doctrine as interpreted and defined by church scholars, and this doctrine was defended with torture, murder, deprivation of freedom, and censorship.

This can be seen mainly as the result of the Scientific Revolution.

He is associated with the Scientific Revolution and the advancement of heliocentrism.

The Scientific Revolution in History - InDepthInfo

When Newton arrived at Cambridge, the Scientific Revolution of the 17th century was already in full force. The heliocentric view of the universe—theorized by astronomers and Johannes Kepler, and later refined by —was well known in most European academic circles. had begun to formulate a new concept of nature as an intricate, impersonal and inert machine. Yet, like most universities in Europe, Cambridge was steeped in Aristotelian philosophy and a view of nature resting on a geocentric view of the universe, dealing with nature in qualitative rather than quantitative terms.

Lecture 6: The Scientific Revolution, 1543-1642 (1)

As previously illustrated, the accumulated knowledge harvested fromscientific procedure and utilized through the genius of application for thebenefit of the individual or the species has contributed immeasurably to thecurrent level of sophistication achieved by humankind. Unfortunately science canbe a double-edged sword capable of great good or great evil and may be swungmaliciously or with beneficence and these consequential cuts, in bothdirections, may be made, under the guise of some other intention or evenunknowingly. It should be evident that with each progressive step into newterritory there are and will continue to be new problems crying out forresolution. Consequently the ladder of success, progress, and advancement thatis often attributed to science is strewn with the refuse of its application. Isit our nature, our lack of insight or our greed, that precludes our fixingproblems at the front end of a given technological process or procedure? Forexample, within the environmental realm even our vast knowledge base concerningecological cycles that are absolutely critical to the proper functioning of ourplanet has not yet prevented us from exploiting our planet for individual ornational advantage. Fueled by the fires of the almighty economy and a humandesire for convenience, the technological subsidy of our species has created aformidable list of problems that have progressed rapidly, in the context of ourhistory, to worldwide scale. Global warming, atmospheric accumulation of ozone,stratospheric depletion of ozone, desertification, acid rain, air and waterpollution, and a loss of biodiversity that surpasses anything ever witnessed onearth represent tribulations that have followed human ascendancy to the role ofplanet earth's undisputed physical sovereign. Are we as a species, however, adespotic monarch? At the risk of becoming too anthropomorphic I willnevertheless ask this question "Have we so repressively subjugated ourenvironment that it too will rebel as humans have always risen againstself-centered and egotistical tyrants?" As a species we must consider thisquestion carefully.

The Scientific Revolution laid down a foundation in which modern science is heavily based on.

Was the Scientific Revolution truly revolutionary

This revolution in scientific affairs, sparked by thinkers like Bacon, Newton, and Descartes, resulted in a significant upheaval in the arts and literature of Europe.

Was the Scientific Revolution ..

The Scientific Revolution happening first and beginning around 1600, was a period of time when new ideas and tools were created and used to experiment with the physical world, occurring between 1600-1750....

An influential figure of the Scientific Revolution is Sir Isaac Newton.

The Scientific Revolution and the Enlightenment were both ..

Although his discoveries were among many made during the Scientific Revolution, Isaac Newton's universal principles of gravity found no parallels in science at the time. Of course, Newton was proven wrong on some of his key assumptions. In the 20th century, would overturn Newton's concept of the universe, stating that space, distance and motion were not absolute but relative, and that the universe was more fantastic than Newton had ever conceived.

The Scientific Revolution - UF Astronomy

Research into this spread of scientific thinking, which would eventually come to influence ideas about such wildly disparate fields of human endeavor as physics, religion, and governmental theory, shows that Francis Bacon played a major role in encouraging the growth of the Scientific Revolution....

The Scientific Revolution - Nearpod

These laws were not only a huge influence on astronomy, but they are the basis of modern physics
Kepler’s and Newton’s laws, with some revision, are still used by astronomers and physicists today
Was the Scientific
Revolution truly revolutionary?
as well as rejecting authority, Descartes' and Bacon's methods and ways of thinking shed light on the issue of equality and natural rights.