that Gaia is a "living" organism is the fact ..

's features a Gaia-like network on the planet of Pandora, in which all the organisms have a biological ability to "connect" and share mental communication. This is perhaps a metaphor for the interconnections and systems between organisms and the environment on Earth. The Gaia-like system in Avatar is referred to as Eywa, a goddess which the natives worship as a mother earth figure. This reference back to earth and the Gaia Hypothesis is further supported by a scene from the move where Jake Sully's Avatar, while "praying" to Eywa, says that they (referring to Humans) "Killed their mother".

The Gaia hypothesis postulates that the climate and ..

Does the Gaia Hypothesis imply that the biosphere is a single living organism?

Gaia hypothesis, Is The Earth A Living Organism

This theory is based on the idea that the self-regulates the conditions on the planet to make its physical environment (in particular temperature and chemistry of the atmosphere) on the planet more hospitable to the species which constitute its "life". The Gaia Hypothesis properly defined this "hospitality" as a full . A model that is often used to illustrate the original Gaia Hypothesis is the so-called simulation.

on the Gaia hypothesis, Is The Earth A Living Organism

After initially being largely ignored by most scientists, (from 1969 until 1977), thereafter for a period, the initial Gaia hypothesis was ridiculed by a number of scientists, like , Dawkins and Gould. Lovelock has said that by naming his theory after a Greek goddess, championed by many non scientists, the Gaia hypothesis was derided as some kind of . Many scientists in particular also criticised the approach taken in his popular book "Gaia, a New look at Life on Earth" for being ; a belief that all things have a predetermined purpose. Lovelock seems to have accepted this criticism of some of his statements, and has worked hard to remove the taint of teleological thinking from his theories, stating "Nowhere in our writings do we express the idea that planetary self-regulation is purposeful, or involves foresight or planning by the ." – (Lovelock, J. E. 1990).

idea that Gaia is a "living" organism is the fact that ..

A accretion Accumulation of dust and gas into larger bodies

The Gaia hypothesis/theory is a reductionist idea that assumes , but upgrades the idea of evolution of organisms to include the environment in which they exist, suggesting that organisms co-evolve with their environment — i.e. that they, as Lovelock put it, "influence their abiotic environment, and that environment in turn influences the biota by Darwinian process".

25 Interesting Facts About Earth That You May Not Know

n the 1960s, a British chemist working with the American space program had a flash of insight. Planet Earth, James Lovelock realized, behaves like one complex, living system of which we humans are, in effect, some of its parts. The physical components of the earth, from its atmosphere to its oceans, closely integrate with all of its living organisms to maintain climatic chemistry in a self-regulating balance ideal for the maintenance and propagation of life.

“We live at a time when extraordinary learning resources are available for schools everywhere

Is the Human Race a Planetary Cancer? | HuffPost

The Gaia hypothesis is used extensively by in his Trilogy, where the planets of Helliconia and, to a lesser extent, Earth, are presented as the main characters in a story spanning the rise and fall of civilizations as influenced by Helliconia's 2,500-year-long cycle of seasons.

Mathematical model to sustain the Gaia hypothesis

Gaia theory- James Lovelock and Lynn Margulis / Théorie …

At the conference criticised the Gaia hypothesis for its imprecision. He claimed that Lovelock and Margulis had not presented one Gaia hypothesis, but four -

Ecological Stoichiometry: Overview - Encyclopedia of …

Terms and Definitions - Solar System

The Gaia hypothesis "was initially criticized for being teleological and contradicting principles of natural selection", because couldn't imagine that the idea that there could be purpose to nature could mean anything other than the existence of an external deity — the fundamental faith-based idea they had been trying so hard to move away from, and found in Darwin('s reformulation of Wallace) the pieces of the puzzle they could cling to for that purpose.